Maybe you are also one of them. If you are interested in knowing what small handwriting means and what it says about the writer, read on. The sizes of middle zone letters, such as a, o, e, m, n, u and v, are a key component while analysing handwriting samples. It suggests how much the writer needs other people in his life.
SECRET An amateur graphologist pleads for at least a dry run on an assessment technique of potential value in intelligence.
The reaction is at times so strong as to give a psychologist the impression that those who shrink from the idea do so because they fear exposure and those who eagerly embrace it are the kind who like to snoop and pry. Whatever the psychological reasons, one thing is certain: The art of handwriting analysis-graphology, as it is more commonly called, especially in Europe--has two branches: The latter is the subject of handwriting analysis tiny writing pads paper.
I am not a professional graphologist, but I have explored the subject enough to be convinced that this black art has a practical application in the assessment of persons to whom access for other character tests is limited.
Since character assessment as distinct from capabilities-testing is as complex as human nature itself, and the art of handwriting analysis is exceedingly difficult in its detail, the most that can be achieved in any short paper is to give an outline of the theory involved, in the hope that those readers who have serious limited-access assessment problems will be encouraged to explore the matter further, independently, either through study or by enlisting the services of a professional graphologist.
Plotting the Terms of Reference Anyone undertaking serious study or investigation of graphology--or of any assessment system, for that matter--must settle three formidable related questions before he can safely submerge himself in the "how" of the technique at all, to wit: It seems to me, on the first question, that we have to specify in some detail precisely what we want to know about a subject's character before we can proceed in any assessment operation, and then keep within these sharply delineated limits to avoid an extensive mire.
Most executives appear willing to settle for any assessment system which will consistently and reliably tip them off to those peculiarities of a given individual which will be helpful and those which will be harmful in the job they are trying to fill.
They seldom appear to be interested in ultimates about anyone's character, in complete "character-pictures" pages long, or in abstract conceptions that have to be interpreted. From the purely practical point of view, then, assessment starts with the job description, and that job description should be supplemented by a list of desirable, undesirable, and fatal traits.
In the absence of such a guide, assessment becomes perforce an undertaking to describe all the traits of a given subject, an exceedingly unrealistic exercise in the present state of psychological knowledge and one which, if conscientiously carried out, results in massive and complicated reports, long delayed.
I should accordingly, without prejudice to the usability of graphology in the field of deeper research, answer the first question as follows: We should consider a reasonably acceptable result from this technique to be a report containing a reliable guide to those character-traits of the subject which make him fit or unfit for the job we have in mind, as specified by us, plus a warning on any character-traits that deviate strongly from the average.
We specify that we want to fill a bank-teller's job. For this with apologies to bank tellers we want a stable and mediocre person who is conscientious, able to stand dull routine, accurate, and honest, one who is not quarrelsome, thieving, aggressive, or imaginative.
We assume that in other respects he will be run-of-the-mill. The assessment turns up one candidate who meets the specifications of general mediocrity and willingness to handle other people's money without appropriating it but who is also exceedingly vain, in fact a peacock.
Such a potentially dangerous factor ought to be reported to us, even if we have not required it. Our second problem, semantics, can cause a great deal of difficulty either in the exercise of the graphological art or in the study of it; it is a pitfall into which many have tumbled. What is an "honest" man?
What is a "brave" man?An analysis of the segment timings also shows the natural acceleration and deceleration that occurs within writing. These changes in speed, that take place in a tiny fraction of a second, confirm a long-standing axiom in the Questioned Document literature, i.e.
naturally made writing is rhythmic, repeatable, and, unconsciously made. Usually, scholars, researchers and great thinkers have small handwriting. For example, take the handwriting samples of Albert Einstein and Sir Issac Newton. Like most creative thinkers, the two have small handwriting.
Now, you may ask why. Have you ever tried writing very small? If no, give it shot. Try writing very very small. Online shopping from a great selection at Electronics Store. Know what small handwriting means and what small writing says about personality.
Small handwriting says the writer is focused and intelligent. Several scholars, such as Einstein and Newton, had small handwriting. Handwriting analysis (also known as graphology) can even be used for detecting lies and revealing possible health ailments.
Check out the infographic below to learn what your handwriting says about you. This is the small size defined by Moretti as the graphological sign ‘Tiny’, which is to say accompanied by handwriting fluidity and profundity of intelligence.